Essay: How far do changes to the regulation of media reflect broader social changes?

The purpose of regulation is to protect children and vulnerable adults from potentially damaging material that will affect them such as; graphic violence or sex. By doing so regulators like the BBFC and OFCOM, have control over what the audience see and do not see. This is a much more conservative idea of how society should be “kept safe” as they believe that the more powerful authorities have a duty to protect the public that may be at risk of coming into contact with harm from certain content in the media. One dominant reason that has changed how film, TV and games are regulated is the internet. These things are much easier to access nowadays due to the internet being on such a wide and global scale. I believe a more liberal view should be taken when making regulatory decisions for the wider public, this is because people are able to make their own choices when it comes to what they want to watch and it is a basic right for people to have the freedom to find entertainment and enjoyment in what they want. For example, by watching a gory, violent horror film a person watching could find themselves purging their negative emotions while watching it (catharsis theory).

For many people for example Mary Whitehouse, horror films can cause the public to contract anxiety over some situations that are put across in the films, this is wide spread moral panic. In order to correctly respond to this, authorities need to put bans and censorships into place like age ratings to show the public that they take the protection of the vulnerable seriously. However, it could be said that regulation has become significantly more relaxed as the last film to have been banned was 2011 (The Bunny Game due to scenes of rape and sexualized violence). This suggests that regulators can now see that people are becoming more and more desensitised to graphic content and therefore they are able to use age ratings as a better way of distributing films rather than banning them completely. The main aim of regulation is to protect in order to prevent the copycat theory from taking place (imitation of what is seen on screen) therefore, the more conservative government want to uphold moral standards to stop societies ideas of acceptability spiralling out of control. As Mary Whitehouse claimed, horror films lead to a more relaxed attitude to homosexuality or divorce and that in strict, conservative thoughts are not suitable for society.


The BBFC in contemporary society have decided that violence is much more damaging than sex to the public eye. Films like Deadpool which portray graphic violence to the extent of chopping people up and a decapitated head flying across the screen have been shown in a better light than others like Blue is The Warmest Colour that shows two females who decide they are lesbians. The reason for this is because in Blue is The Warmest colour there is quite graphic sex shown. The inconsistent ideas between sex and violence are very contradictory, as some could say that violence is far worse to show to the wider public compared to sex because sex is a completely natural thing that most people are confronted with. 

Comments